Pupil Premium
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2022 to 2023 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School Overview
Detail |
Data |
School name |
Watercliffe Meadow |
Number of pupils in school |
496 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
55% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2022 - 2025 |
Date this statement was published |
October 2022 |
Date on which it will be reviewed |
September 2023 |
Statement authorised by |
Ian Read |
Pupil premium lead |
Emma Wayper |
Governor / Trustee lead |
Vicky Helliwell/ Margaret Anderson |
Funding Overview
Detail |
Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£301,930 |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
£32,190 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£2,869,291 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of Intent
When considering the allocation of our pupil premium and catch-up funding we have taken into account the context of our school. There are a range of barriers that prevent disadvantaged pupils from making similar progress or attainment to others including acquisition of language skills, limited parental support, attendance and punctuality and having less life experience than others.
Pupils in receipt of the Pupil Premium Grant may also have special educational needs and as a consequence face multiple-disadvantages.
At Watercliffe Meadow our aim is for all pupils to enjoy attend school regularly and achieve good progress regardless of educational and socio-economic barriers.
Our ultimate objectives are therefore to ensure a holistic approach for all as follows:
- All children and their needs are fully understood by well trained staff delivering a Trauma Informed approach.
- Attendance remains a high priority; we are committed to working with families to address this.
- All children make good progress in reading, early reading and a rigorous phonics approach is central to the school. Children not making progress are precisely identified for high quality intervention.
- Barriers to learning for all children must be precisely identified particularly when needs are more complex and multifaceted. SEND support and family support ensure a holistic approach. All children should access highly effective quality first teaching alongside purposeful monitoring of approaches and provision.
- Ensure parental engagement for disadvantaged children is consistent with non-disadvantaged pupils.
- Our curriculum aims to develop the whole child, intellectually, physically, emotionally and socially. We provide opportunities through a wide range of activities both in and beyond the classroom.
We recognise that not all pupils who qualify for Free School Meals are claiming them, we therefore reserve the right to allocate Pupil Premium Funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils that we have legitimately identified as being socially disadvantaged.
We will know we have been successful when attendance and engagement of PP children is high and as a result progress is good and the gap between PP children and non-PP children is significantly lower.
Intended Outcomes
- Instil a love of reading across the school with additional focus on disadvantaged pupils.
- Employ additional staffing (classroom and non-classroom based) to provide opportunities for working in smaller groups or for catch up and keep up activities, as well as staff to support the wider needs of the identified pupils and their families.
- To provide support through interventions to improve or consolidate progress and attainment for disadvantaged pupils.
- Attendance has the highest priority with a clear action plan, rigorous monitoring and supportive or parents/carers.
To provide opportunities to experience a broad range of activities from sports, arts and music to residentials and visits.
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified amongst our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
1. |
Trauma Informed Approach Almost 20% of our pupils have experienced 3 or more ‘adverse childhood experiences’, this figure rises as children move through school. Without the strong relational practice in a safe and nurturing environment, learning couldn’t take place for many of our pupils. Engagement in learning takes place because addressing children’s emotional needs is fundamental to enabling this to happen on a daily basis. |
2. |
Attendance Attendance across school is below target, a growing number of families are needing support with this and punctuality, particularly disadvantaged children. Without support this will have a significant impact on learning and progress. |
3. |
Reading / Phonics There is evidence that children have fallen behind in reading, KS1 data shows this, particularly the disadvantaged. There is a need to accelerate progress in early reading to close this gap. |
4.
|
Multi-Faceted Approach to Barriers to Learning A high number of pupil premium pupils in each cohort, have an additional vulnerability, we identify these as our multi-faceted needs children. These include low levels of language development, EAL, SEND, SEMH needs, safeguarding concerns and chaotic family life. This leads to a greater requirement for more personalised support for learning and pastoral needs. Detailed analysis of disadvantaged and multifaceted needs to identify barriers to learning and what is hindering progress and then identify the correct intervention/action needed. Children’s barriers to learning are identified and acted upon by placing children on the correct pathway (SEN, S&L, attendance, parental engagement.) As a result, the attainment gap closes and progress is rapid. Early intervention (S&L, learning mentor support, TISUK strategies) Boxall profile analysis and a golden model approach means that unless the need is complex the barriers are identified and addressed and progress is in line by the end of Year 2. |
5. |
Parental Engagement Parental engagement is not consistent across school, again particularly amongst disadvantaged children. A growing number of families are experiencing financial hardship. |
6. |
Development of the Whole Child Our curriculum aims to develop the whole child, intellectually, physically, emotionally and socially. We provide opportunities through a wide range of activities both in and beyond the classroom. We encourage children to seek their own interests, gifts and talents through the experiences we deliberately provide for them. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
Challenge 1: Trauma Informed Approach |
|
Challenge 2: Attendance |
|
Challenge 3: Reading/Phonics |
|
Challenge 4: Multi-Faceted Approach to Barriers to Learning
|
|
Challenge 5: Parental Engagement |
|
Challenge 6: Development of the whole child |
|
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £55, 704
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Internal data and monitoring outcomes Oral Language Intervention and small group intervention |
1 multi faceted needs children |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £129, 458
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
EEF Toolkit: Oral Language Intervention and small group intervention EEF Toolkit: Digital Technology and Homework EEF: Extending School Time EEF: Small Group Intervention EEF: Digital Technology |
1 multi faceted needs children 2 Reading progress |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £117, 692
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Embed and enhance the use of TISUK across school impacting on pupils through staff having a shared understanding ACES and their impact, the brain – development and responses, regulation and dysregulation and the importance of empathy and connection. Use of Zones of Regulation work with individuals
|
Internal data and monitoring outcomes TISUK EEF Toolkit: Social and Emotional Learning |
1,3,4 |
Re-establish full systems for monitoring and managing attendance, with a particular focus on PAs. Daily monitoring of PP pupils struggling with attendance, using individual family action plans when required/internal red lists Identify families for targeted parenting groups Access to free breakfast club provision for all to support attendance and wellbeing. See attendance implementation plan. |
Internal data and monitoring outcomes Data analysis |
3,4 |
Work with identified families to support and sign post when required, including support through MAST, MHST, parenting etc. Run a range of parental workshops understanding the importance of attendance, supporting understanding of phonics and early reading and essential skills support for Maths. Targeted parental programmes linked to behaviour, attendance and SEND. |
EEF Toolkit: Engaging and Supporting Parents |
4 |
Total budgeted cost: £302, 854
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2022 to 2023 academic year.
Key Stage 2 Outcomes 2022-23 |
||||
|
Reading (Expected+) |
Writing (Expected+) |
Maths (Expected+) |
Combined |
National |
73% |
71% |
73% |
59% |
School |
72% |
64% |
67% |
55% |
Pupil Premium |
69% |
64% |
62% |
51% |
Non-Pupil Premium |
75% |
62% |
72% |
59% |
Analysis: Overall, in writing, there is still a gap between national and school outcomes. In writing, PP children attained slightly better than non-PP children. In reading there is still a gap between PP and non-PP. Of those PP children who did not attain expected levels 100% had either low attainment at KS1, below 90% attendance, were on the SEND register or were registered as EAL. 60% of these children had 2 or more of these factors. 33% had attendance less than 90%; 58% had KS1 data either WTS or PK, 25% had EAL and 58% were on the SEND register. In maths, there is a gap between PP and non-PP attainment. Of those PP children who did not attain expected levels 93% had either low attain at KS1, below 90% attendance, were on the SEND register or were registered as EAL; out of these children 79% had 2 or more of these factors. |
Key Stage 1 Outcomes 2022-23 |
||||
|
Reading (Expected+) |
Writing (Expected+) |
Maths (Expected+) |
Y1 Phonics Screening Check |
National |
69% |
61% |
72% |
81% |
School |
53% |
52% |
62% |
88% |
Pupil Premium |
42% |
39% |
55% |
% |
Non-Pupil Premium |
66% |
69% |
72% |
% |
Analysis: There is a gap in reading between PP and non-PP attainment. In reading, of those PP children who did not attain expected levels 100% had either below 90% attendance, were on the SEND register or were registered as EAL. Of those children 36% had 2 or more of these factors. There is a gap in writing between PP and non-PP. In writing, 100% had either below 90% attendance, were on the SEND register or were registered as EAL. Of those, 25% had 2 or more of those factors. There is a gap in maths attainment between PP and non-PP children. Of those PP children who did not attain expected levels 100% had either below 90% attendance, were on the SEND register or were registered as EAL. Of those children 40% had 2 or more of these factors. |
Challenges |
Summary of outcomes |
Challenge 1: Trauma Informed Approach |
School has continued to move forward with work on a trauma informed approach. We are the first mainstream school in Sheffield to receive the TISUK award in September 2023. It remains a key strand in staff appraisals.
|
Challenge 2: Attendance |
Improving attendance has been a key focus for SLT this year. Half termly strategic meetings analyse all pupils across school with attendance below 90% and from this a ‘red list’ of pupils is identified where attendance is sporadic and deemed to be not simply genuine illness. The red list of pupils is tracked daily with follow up phone calls and home visits when appropriate. The red list is revised each half term and improvements or dips of attendance are tracked.
|
Challenge 3: Reading/Phonics |
|
Challenge 4: Multi-Faceted Approach to Barriers to Learning
|
|
Challenge 5: Parental Engagement |
|
Challenge 6: Development of the whole child |
|